MEET:
Helen Law KC
“One of the most able advocates of her generation."
Legal 500, 2024
Helen is an experienced criminal trial advocate with complementary expertise in advising on and litigating criminal justice and human rights issues in civil and public law proceedings. She has extensive experience of dealing with sensitive cases and vulnerable clients.
Alongside regular trial work, Helen advises at the investigatory stage and has appeared in criminal cases before the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Privy Council and European Court of Human Rights.
Her cases include:
- Counsel for the Financial Conduct Authority prosecuting one of the largest and most serious alleged frauds by a regulated person, totalling £64m over 9 years;
- Counsel for the defendant in a substantial drugs and conspiracy to murder prosecution, raising novel legal issues concerning Encrochat admissibility;
- Counsel for the first defendant in the first modern prosecution of a spy ring under the Official Secrets Act 1911;
- Sole counsel for a serving MP, Apsana Begum, charged with housing fraud, acquitted at trial (Snaresbrook Crown Court);
- Junior counsel for Soldier A, accused of murdering an IRA member in 1972, in the first of a series of historic murder prosecutions relating to the Troubles, prosecution evidence excluded and trial collapsed (Belfast Crown Court);
- Criminal counsel for the appellant before the Supreme Court concerning the meaning of capacity to consent under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and its interrelation with the same concept under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (A Local Authority v JB);
- Leading counsel in a £3m boiler room fraud (Southwark Crown Court);
- Advising foreign individuals and entities on human rights aspects of foreign criminal investigations;
- Advising a major UK company on an internal investigation concerning domestic and cross-border issues.
Helen’s civil and public law practice is focused on claims against the state in the context of criminal justice or national security. She is experienced in the operation of Closed Material Proceedings under the Justice and Security Act 2013 and Part 80 proceedings under the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011. She has appeared before both the Investigatory Powers Tribunal and SIAC, as well as the High Court in TPIM proceedings. Helen is regularly instructed in criminal justice related public law matters, including challenges to decisions not to prosecute and claims concerning the application of human rights law in the criminal context.
Her cases include:
- Leading counsel for the respondent in TPIM proceedings;
- Sole counsel for 2 claimants in habeas proceedings before the British Indian Ocean Territory Supreme Court, including cross examination of FCDO witnesses;
- Sole counsel for a rape complainant in proceedings against her educational institution, settled at mediation;
- R (Noorzai) v MOD; R (Saifullah) v MOD –counsel for the Claimants in judicial reviews concerning alleged SAS involvement in extra-judicial killings in Afghanistan, which led to the establishment of the Inquiry into Afghanistan, in which she is also instructed;
- R (Belhaj) v DPP [2019] AC 593 –counsel for the Claimants in a judicial review of the decision not to prosecute a senior member of MI6 for his alleged involvement in extraordinary rendition, culminating in the leading case on the inapplicability of the Justice and Security Act 2013 closed material procedures to challenges to prosecutorial decisions;
- Q v MI6 & ors –counsel for the Claimant in a civil damages claim for the alleged involvement of an MI6 officer in false imprisonment and mistreatment;
- Kamoka & Ors v MI5, MI6 & ors –counsel for multiple Claimants in civil damages claims for the alleged involvement of UK intelligence services in serious and sustained misconduct in the UK and abroad;
- Al-Waheed & Alseran v MOD [2019] QB 1251 –counsel for the 2 lead Claimants in civil damages claims against the MOD for detention and mistreatment in Iraq
Helen has extensive experience of claims against the police and other investigatory or prosecutorial bodies, including SOCA, the CPS and the Armed Forces RMP and RNP. She is regularly instructed in cases concerning serious investigative failings, including those leading to death or serious injury, and has experience of claims under the HRA, the Equality Act, the Data Protection Act, misuse of private information, misfeasance and malicious prosecution. She acts both for the victims of crime and for those accused of involvement in criminal offences. Helen regularly represents individuals at mediations and in settlement negotiations, as well as at trial, and has extensive experience in advising on strategic litigation in this field.
Her cases include:
- Leading counsel for the Claimant in a claim against the MOD for rape by a commanding officer;
- Sole counsel in a claim for misfeasance in a murder investigation;
- Sole counsel in a claim by a child that he was subjected to Article 3 violations in the course of a high profile murder investigation;
- Junior counsel for the ex-wives of the undercover officers in the Undercover Policing Inquiry;
- Junior counsel for interveners before the Supreme Court in DSD v Commissioner of the Metropolis [2019] AC 196, concerning the nature and scope of the Art 3 investigative duty.
- Counsel for a young black man subjected to a spit hood at London Bridge station, in successfully challenging his police caution;
- Acting for multiple individuals and families subjected to or bereaved by domestic or sexual violence in their claims for breaches of the investigative and protective duties.
In addition to her domestic experience, Helen has litigated before both the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Her notable cases include:
- Serbia v Croatia (Genocide Convention) –counsel for Croatia, including oral submissions before the ICJ;
- Al-Saadoon v UK –counsel for the applicants in a case concerning Article 1 jurisdiction and the UK’s obligations when handing over detainees to the Iraqi authorities;
- Al-Jedda v UK (Grand Chamber) – junior counsel for the applicants in the leading case on the application of Article 5 in armed conflict;
- CN v UK – junior counsel for the applicant in the first case to find a breach of the UK’s duty under Article 4.
Helen is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. In order to provide legal services to their clients, including advice and representation services, Helen needs to collect and hold personal data. This includes their client’s personal data and the personal data of others who feature in the matter upon which they are instructed. To read Helen’s privacy notice in full, please see here.
"Helen is an excellent court advocate. She can draw from her expertise in criminal law with civil law. She is strong on legal arguments and has a real feel for how to present issues before the courts." "Helen Law is a brilliant advocate who grasps the key essential points to a case and leaves no stone unturned. She is extremely thorough and delivers an exceptional service to solicitors and clients."
"Helen Law is a really capable advocate with good judgement and excellent client skills." "Helen Law is amazing and is maybe underappreciated." "Helen Law is an equitable silk, in all but name." "Helen Law is one of the best advocates around." "Helen Law is absolutely remarkable and has an incredible insight in matters."
"A hugely experienced junior, particularly in relation to cases concerning failures to investigate and prosecute rape and serious sexual offences. Helen is super bright, responsive and collaborative. She can slice through complexity and get to the heart of the case. Gives clear, practical advice."
"Helen is a star performer on all levels, she is very dedicated to her clients and cases, her written work is excellent, and her down to earth approach is a winner with clients and juries."
"She is a wonderful advocate for victims of crime, especially victims of sexual violence. She is approachable, responsive and brilliant."
"Helen has a huge brain. She is extremely responsive to her solicitors and can turn her hand to anything. Her advocacy is wonderful."
"Helen is an all rounder - her knowledge of criminal law is such an asset in this area of work and she has got some great results in my cases. She is quick, clever and strategic."
"Helen is really impressive. She knew the law inside out, and was proactive and supportive."
"Helen is incredibly bright. She is meticulous and drafts beautifully. She has a lovely advocacy style and is great with vulnerable clients."
"Helen Law has the ability to understand the issues and has a pragmatic approach which is really effective. She doesn't pull any punches in advocacy." "She has really strong experience and understanding of criminal procedure. She turns the work around really quickly, she is realistic about timeframes and she is also a really good strategist." "Helen Law's advocacy and written work are fantastic and she brings excellent client care skills to boot. A real fighter with a track record to match."
"Helen is simply superb. She has an incredible mind, she is strategic, and she is an amazing advocate."
"Helen is a fabulous courtroom advocate who has always had authority in the courtroom way beyond her year of call. She is so clear and persuasive."
"Helen is a phenomenal advocate with an incredible intellect, who is someone who has the personal touch." "Her input before the trial was invaluable and she was very good with clients in conference."
"Helen is exceedingly clever, hugely efficient, and her advocacy is excellent. She is incredibly strategic, anticipating issues and problems far in advance and ensuring the claimant legal team is prepared for anything."
"She is a brilliant barrister: fiercely intelligent, hard-working and responsive to the needs of clients and instructing solicitors. She is an impressive advocate and demonstrates extraordinary commitment to the work she does and the clients she represents." "She is fearless. She argues her point really effectively and gets brilliant results."
"A fantastic jury advocate who is also good at technical legal writing." "She is really making her mark at the criminal Bar."
"Helen is unafraid to take really creative approaches to complex legal cases. She is just an incredibly precise legal thinker who is empathetic with clients, yet perfectly pragmatic as well."
"Delightful to work with and always goes the extra mile. She is very good at articulating potentially pivotal points and is a fearless advocate."
"Extremely responsive, with outstanding abilities."
"One of the most able advocates of her generation. Her knowledge across the areas of her practice are formidable and she puts this to excellent use in her advocacy."
"Helen is very astute, pleasure to work with, excellent drafting skills, very responsive."
"She is a fantastic jury advocate." "She is very good with clients." "She has got a brilliant mind and is extremely dedicated."
"Her preparation is second to none, her cross-examination skills are fantastic. A barrister who really gets the case and will do a fantastic job."
"Extremely responsive, with outstanding abilities."
"Helen has a knack for getting to the heart of the issues." "She is incredibly generous with her time, she is a very, very good strategic thinker and she is passionate about the issues affecting clients."
"She's an astute and quick-witted advocate with excellent analytical skills and the ability to empathise with clients and explain legal issues clearly to them."
"A superb advocate who does the groundwork, engages with the client and works collaboratively to great effect."
"Tenacious and very bright. She is keen to take on challenging cases and push at the boundaries of the law where appropriate” “She is persuasive, determined and gets excellent results."
"Fantastic with clients, a real fighter and someone who is willing to push the boundaries of law. She adopts a sensible litigation strategy and is good at punching down the other side and identifying the pressure points in an opponent’s case."
"A formidable trial advocate."
"Outstanding on her feet."
"A skilled cross-examiner with the ability to construct a very persuasive legal argument."
MAIN AREAS OF PRACTICE:
+44 (0)20 7404 3447
“One of the most able advocates of her generation."
Legal 500, 2024
MAIN AREAS OF PRACTICE
- Crime
- Corporate and Business Crime
- Fraud and Financial Crime
- Proceeds of Crime and Asset Forfeiture
- Serious Crime (including terrorism) and Trial Advocacy
- Investigations
- Public International Law
- Public Law
- Civil Liberties and Human Rights
- Police, Inquests and Prison
- Private International Law
Helen Law KC
Contact Helen: helenlaw@matrixlaw.co.uk | +44 (0)20 7404 3447
Contact Helen's Practice Team (Team T): TeamT@matrixlaw.co.uk
Helen is an experienced criminal trial advocate with complementary expertise in advising on and litigating criminal justice and human rights issues in civil and public law proceedings. She has extensive experience of dealing with sensitive cases and vulnerable clients.
Crime and Investigations
Alongside regular trial work, Helen advises at the investigatory stage and has appeared in criminal cases before the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Privy Council and European Court of Human Rights.
Her cases include:
- Counsel for the Financial Conduct Authority prosecuting one of the largest and most serious alleged frauds by a regulated person, totalling £64m over 9 years;
- Counsel for the defendant in a substantial drugs and conspiracy to murder prosecution, raising novel legal issues concerning Encrochat admissibility;
- Counsel for the first defendant in the first modern prosecution of a spy ring under the Official Secrets Act 1911;
- Sole counsel for a serving MP, Apsana Begum, charged with housing fraud, acquitted at trial (Snaresbrook Crown Court);
- Junior counsel for Soldier A, accused of murdering an IRA member in 1972, in the first of a series of historic murder prosecutions relating to the Troubles, prosecution evidence excluded and trial collapsed (Belfast Crown Court);
- Criminal counsel for the appellant before the Supreme Court concerning the meaning of capacity to consent under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and its interrelation with the same concept under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (A Local Authority v JB);
- Leading counsel in a £3m boiler room fraud (Southwark Crown Court);
- Advising foreign individuals and entities on human rights aspects of foreign criminal investigations;
- Advising a major UK company on an internal investigation concerning domestic and cross-border issues.
Civil And Public Law
Helen’s civil and public law practice is focused on claims against the state in the context of criminal justice or national security. She is experienced in the operation of Closed Material Proceedings under the Justice and Security Act 2013 and Part 80 proceedings under the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011. She has appeared before both the Investigatory Powers Tribunal and SIAC, as well as the High Court in TPIM proceedings. Helen is regularly instructed in criminal justice related public law matters, including challenges to decisions not to prosecute and claims concerning the application of human rights law in the criminal context.
Her cases include:
- Leading counsel for the respondent in TPIM proceedings;
- Sole counsel for 2 claimants in habeas proceedings before the British Indian Ocean Territory Supreme Court, including cross examination of FCDO witnesses;
- Sole counsel for a rape complainant in proceedings against her educational institution, settled at mediation;
- R (Noorzai) v MOD; R (Saifullah) v MOD –counsel for the Claimants in judicial reviews concerning alleged SAS involvement in extra-judicial killings in Afghanistan, which led to the establishment of the Inquiry into Afghanistan, in which she is also instructed;
- R (Belhaj) v DPP [2019] AC 593 –counsel for the Claimants in a judicial review of the decision not to prosecute a senior member of MI6 for his alleged involvement in extraordinary rendition, culminating in the leading case on the inapplicability of the Justice and Security Act 2013 closed material procedures to challenges to prosecutorial decisions;
- Q v MI6 & ors –counsel for the Claimant in a civil damages claim for the alleged involvement of an MI6 officer in false imprisonment and mistreatment;
- Kamoka & Ors v MI5, MI6 & ors –counsel for multiple Claimants in civil damages claims for the alleged involvement of UK intelligence services in serious and sustained misconduct in the UK and abroad;
- Al-Waheed & Alseran v MOD [2019] QB 1251 –counsel for the 2 lead Claimants in civil damages claims against the MOD for detention and mistreatment in Iraq
Police Law
Helen has extensive experience of claims against the police and other investigatory or prosecutorial bodies, including SOCA, the CPS and the Armed Forces RMP and RNP. She is regularly instructed in cases concerning serious investigative failings, including those leading to death or serious injury, and has experience of claims under the HRA, the Equality Act, the Data Protection Act, misuse of private information, misfeasance and malicious prosecution. She acts both for the victims of crime and for those accused of involvement in criminal offences. Helen regularly represents individuals at mediations and in settlement negotiations, as well as at trial, and has extensive experience in advising on strategic litigation in this field.
Her cases include:
- Leading counsel for the Claimant in a claim against the MOD for rape by a commanding officer;
- Sole counsel in a claim for misfeasance in a murder investigation;
- Sole counsel in a claim by a child that he was subjected to Article 3 violations in the course of a high profile murder investigation;
- Junior counsel for the ex-wives of the undercover officers in the Undercover Policing Inquiry;
- Junior counsel for interveners before the Supreme Court in DSD v Commissioner of the Metropolis [2019] AC 196, concerning the nature and scope of the Art 3 investigative duty.
- Counsel for a young black man subjected to a spit hood at London Bridge station, in successfully challenging his police caution;
- Acting for multiple individuals and families subjected to or bereaved by domestic or sexual violence in their claims for breaches of the investigative and protective duties.
International Law
In addition to her domestic experience, Helen has litigated before both the International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Her notable cases include:
- Serbia v Croatia (Genocide Convention) –counsel for Croatia, including oral submissions before the ICJ;
- Al-Saadoon v UK –counsel for the applicants in a case concerning Article 1 jurisdiction and the UK’s obligations when handing over detainees to the Iraqi authorities;
- Al-Jedda v UK (Grand Chamber) – junior counsel for the applicants in the leading case on the application of Article 5 in armed conflict;
- CN v UK – junior counsel for the applicant in the first case to find a breach of the UK’s duty under Article 4.
Helen's Privacy Notice
Helen is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. In order to provide legal services to my clients, including advice and representation services, Helen needs to collect and hold personal data. This includes her client’s personal data and the personal data of others who feature in the matter upon which she is instructed. To read Helen’s privacy notice in full, please see here.
DIRECTORY RECOMMENDATIONS
"Helen is an excellent court advocate. She can draw from her expertise in criminal law with civil law. She is strong on legal arguments and has a real feel for how to present issues before the courts." "Helen Law is a brilliant advocate who grasps the key essential points to a case and leaves no stone unturned. She is extremely thorough and delivers an exceptional service to solicitors and clients."
"Helen Law is a really capable advocate with good judgement and excellent client skills." "Helen Law is amazing and is maybe underappreciated." "Helen Law is an equitable silk, in all but name." "Helen Law is one of the best advocates around." "Helen Law is absolutely remarkable and has an incredible insight in matters."
"A hugely experienced junior, particularly in relation to cases concerning failures to investigate and prosecute rape and serious sexual offences. Helen is super bright, responsive and collaborative. She can slice through complexity and get to the heart of the case. Gives clear, practical advice."
"Helen is a star performer on all levels, she is very dedicated to her clients and cases, her written work is excellent, and her down to earth approach is a winner with clients and juries."
"She is a wonderful advocate for victims of crime, especially victims of sexual violence. She is approachable, responsive and brilliant."
"Helen has a huge brain. She is extremely responsive to her solicitors and can turn her hand to anything. Her advocacy is wonderful."
"Helen is an all rounder - her knowledge of criminal law is such an asset in this area of work and she has got some great results in my cases. She is quick, clever and strategic."
"Helen is really impressive. She knew the law inside out, and was proactive and supportive."
"Helen is incredibly bright. She is meticulous and drafts beautifully. She has a lovely advocacy style and is great with vulnerable clients."
"Helen Law has the ability to understand the issues and has a pragmatic approach which is really effective. She doesn't pull any punches in advocacy." "She has really strong experience and understanding of criminal procedure. She turns the work around really quickly, she is realistic about timeframes and she is also a really good strategist." "Helen Law's advocacy and written work are fantastic and she brings excellent client care skills to boot. A real fighter with a track record to match."
"Helen is simply superb. She has an incredible mind, she is strategic, and she is an amazing advocate."
"Helen is a fabulous courtroom advocate who has always had authority in the courtroom way beyond her year of call. She is so clear and persuasive."
"Helen is a phenomenal advocate with an incredible intellect, who is someone who has the personal touch." "Her input before the trial was invaluable and she was very good with clients in conference."
"Helen is exceedingly clever, hugely efficient, and her advocacy is excellent. She is incredibly strategic, anticipating issues and problems far in advance and ensuring the claimant legal team is prepared for anything."
"She is a brilliant barrister: fiercely intelligent, hard-working and responsive to the needs of clients and instructing solicitors. She is an impressive advocate and demonstrates extraordinary commitment to the work she does and the clients she represents." "She is fearless. She argues her point really effectively and gets brilliant results."
"A fantastic jury advocate who is also good at technical legal writing." "She is really making her mark at the criminal Bar."
"Helen is unafraid to take really creative approaches to complex legal cases. She is just an incredibly precise legal thinker who is empathetic with clients, yet perfectly pragmatic as well."
"Delightful to work with and always goes the extra mile. She is very good at articulating potentially pivotal points and is a fearless advocate."
"Extremely responsive, with outstanding abilities."
"One of the most able advocates of her generation. Her knowledge across the areas of her practice are formidable and she puts this to excellent use in her advocacy."
"Helen is very astute, pleasure to work with, excellent drafting skills, very responsive."
"She is a fantastic jury advocate." "She is very good with clients." "She has got a brilliant mind and is extremely dedicated."
"Her preparation is second to none, her cross-examination skills are fantastic. A barrister who really gets the case and will do a fantastic job."
"Extremely responsive, with outstanding abilities."
"Helen has a knack for getting to the heart of the issues." "She is incredibly generous with her time, she is a very, very good strategic thinker and she is passionate about the issues affecting clients."
"She's an astute and quick-witted advocate with excellent analytical skills and the ability to empathise with clients and explain legal issues clearly to them."
"A superb advocate who does the groundwork, engages with the client and works collaboratively to great effect."
"Tenacious and very bright. She is keen to take on challenging cases and push at the boundaries of the law where appropriate” “She is persuasive, determined and gets excellent results."
"Fantastic with clients, a real fighter and someone who is willing to push the boundaries of law. She adopts a sensible litigation strategy and is good at punching down the other side and identifying the pressure points in an opponent’s case."
"A formidable trial advocate."
"Outstanding on her feet."
"A skilled cross-examiner with the ability to construct a very persuasive legal argument."